Navigator logo

Restoring Balance to the Province: Ontario Fall Economic Statement

Yesterday, Ontario Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy released the province’s Fall Economic Statement (FES). While the Liberals and NDP criticized the FES for a lack of new initiatives, Tories say the mini budget reflects their core value of fiscal responsibility without compromising key investments for Ontario workers and families. There’s a lot to digest between moving towards a balanced budget and new investments. Don’t worry, we have got you covered:

Fiscally Responsible Ford Government

The biggest piece of information: government revenues are up $7 billion, and the government projects a balanced budget in 2026-2027.

With revenue on the rise, the Progressive Conservatives reduced the deficit to $6.6 billion, projecting a balanced budget in 2026, with the option to balance in 2025 ahead of an early election. Provincial revenues are as high as ever, according to the government, with an increase of nearly $60 billion since 2018. The main drivers for this? The government says strong support for businesses, a growing economy and no increases in sales tax.

The FES also provides an update on LCBO’s revenues. While the 2024-2025 figures will result in a slight decline, the government is confident revenues will reach $8.5 billion in 2026-2027, $100 million more than projected in the 2024 budget, despite the expansion of alcohol sales to big box retailers and convenience stores across the province.

The Big Winners

The first pillar of the government’s FES is built on re-investing into Ontario’s economy, specifically highlighting the province’s manufacturing and life sciences sectors. The major announcements within the budget include:

  • $94 million as part of Phase 2 of the Life Sciences Strategy;
  • An additional $100 million into the Invest Ontario Fund;
  • Another $40 million to extend the Advanced Manufacturing and Innovation Competitiveness Stream; and
  • Extending and enhancing the Time-Limited tax Relief for the Electricity Distribution Sector until December 31, 2028.

Municipalities get more support

Following the 2024 budget, Ontario’s Big City Mayors commended the government for “listening to municipalities” and addressing infrastructure deficits across the province.

The Ontario government is doubling down on supporting municipalities, with an emphasis on smaller communities.

  • $100 million over the next two years to increase the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund. This is the primary transfer payment from the province to municipalities, giving smaller townships with less income, more funds to operate;
  • $1 billion for the new Municipal Infrastructure Program to support projects enabling housing starts in growing communities; and
  • Enhancing the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund to $825 million.

The province is also prioritizing supporting Ontario taxpayers with direct reimbursements, including tax rebates and cuts, simplifying payment methods for transit, and tying supports to inflation. More specifically, the province is:

  • Proposing to provide a $200 taxpayer rebate, for all eligible adult Ontario tax filers, plus an additional $200 for each eligible child under 18 whose families qualify for a Canada Child Benefit payment for 2024;
  • Proposing to extend the current temporary gas tax and fuel tax rate cuts keeping the rates at nine cents per liter until June 30, 2025;
  • Launching One Fare so transit riders only pay once for transfers between transit systems in the Greater Toronto Area; and
  • Expanding the Ontario Guaranteed Annual Income System (GAINS) program and indexing the GAINS benefit to inflation.

Primary care takes primary role

Finally, the province is redoubling its efforts to invest in healthcare, focusing on primary care training, fertility care accessibility and supporting seniors. Specific strategies include:

  • Extending Ontario’s Learn and Stay program by providing an additional $17.7 million for 2026-27;
  • Expanding the Ontario Fertility Program by $150 million and committing to introduce a new fertility tax credit in 2025;
  • Prioritizing access for Ontario residents for medical school seats; and
  • Investing $17 million over the next 3 years to support 100 new Seniors Active Living Centres.

Why it matters

  • This FES represents the return to a fiscal norm that Tories have been craving, especially after payouts surrounding Bill 124 had inflated Ford’s deficit to higher levels than promised.
  • The contents of the FES, especially the $200 taxpayer rebate, are all important incentives for the PC’s to offer voters as they gear up for a potential early election in the spring of next year.

Opposition says FES focused on wrong issues

Liberals

According to Ontario Liberals, Doug Ford is “failing to do his job and address the issues that really matter to Ontario families.” The Liberals did not hold back when commenting on this year’s FES, criticizing the government on two main topics, health care and prioritizing Ontario’s wealthiest.

Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie focused on Ford’s desire to put “his rich friends first”:

  • “Doug Ford is more focused on billion-dollar giveaways to wealthy insiders than he is on fixing health care. People are dying on waitlists, and Doug Ford is spending billions on booze, foreign spas and the Greenbelt scandal.”

This response is consistent with their month-long criticism of Ford’s handling of Ontario’s health care system.

NDP

Similar to the Liberals, the NDP framed Ford’s fiscally focused FES as out-of-touch with the lived realities of everyday Ontarians.

In a statement, Leader of the Opposition Marit Stiles claimed Ontarians “aren’t getting what they paid for,” arguing it is filled with “stale ideas and empty promises.” Specifically, the NDP pointed out the reduced amount of housing starts, delay of transit projects, and lack of supports to address the cost of living as major oversights.

Saskatchewan Provincial Election

The Saskatchewan Party (Sask Party) made history on October 28, 2024, becoming Canada’s longest-serving provincial government by winning a record fifth term. While voters ultimately demonstrated continued trust in Moe’s leadership, seeking solutions for health-care capacity, improvements to the education system, and relief from affordability challenges, the NDP made significant gains, nearly doubling their seat count from 14 in the 2020 election.

Backed by Rural Strongholds: Sask Party Wins Record Fifth Term

As of Tuesday morning, the Sask Party won 32 of 61 seats in the Legislature (with leads in three more), down from the 48 seats they won in 2020. Upstart right-wing parties like the Saskatchewan United Party (SUP) didn’t dent rural support enough to cause a problem for Moe’s Sask Party but the party did sustain significant losses in urban areas, particularly in Regina where it appears they failed to win a single seat, as of the time of writing. This urban divide was also evident in the popular vote: the Sask Party captured 65 per cent in rural regions but only about 40 per cent in both Regina and Saskatoon, trailing the NDP’s 55 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively.

Moe seemed to acknowledge this issue Monday, adopting a cooperative tone in his victory speech. He referenced potential perceptions of a divided province but emphasized that, regardless of how they voted, Saskatchewanians cast their ballots with the province’s best interests in mind. We expect the NDP to highlight this looming division given there will be very few urban voices in cabinet, in a province where most of the population lives in cities. Moving forward, we’ll be watching how the Sask Party navigates urban voters and their priorities.

The preliminary seat count stands at:

  • Saskatchewan Party: 32 (leading in 3)
  • NDP: 22 (leading in 4)

Key Battlegrounds That Carried the Day

As late as Saturday, October 26, polling showed both parties in a near deadlock. Despite significant changes to Saskatchewan’s electoral map, the NDP proved unsuccessful in breaking the rural wall. Urban voters were a different story. The results in key ridings led to the loss of five Sask Party ministers’ seats:

  • Justice Minister and Attorney General Bronwyn Eyre lost her seat in Saskatoon Stonebridge, where the NDP’s Darcy Warrington won with 53.8 per cent of the vote.
  • Parks, Culture and Sport Minister Laura Ross lost her seat in Regina Roachdale. A Sask Party MLA since 2007, Ross was defeated by the NDP’s Joan Pratchler, who won with 52.6 per cent of the vote.
  • In a close race, Environment Minister Christine Tell may lose her seat in Regina Wascana Plains to the NDP’s Brent Blakely by just 4 per cent. The result may have been influenced by SUP candidate Dustin Plett, who currently holds 4.5 per cent of the vote.
  • Social Services Minister Gene Makowsky lost his Regina University seat to the NDP’s Sally Housser, who won with 51 per cent of the vote.
  • Minister of Corrections, Policing and Public Safety Paul Merriman may lose his seat in Saskatoon Silverspring-Sutherland to the NDP’s Hugh Gordon in a tight race, currently trailing by 3.3 per cent.

A Change Election? Yes and No

In an innovative approach to the 2024 provincial election, Elections Saskatchewan introduced “voting week” for the first time, with polls open the week prior to election day. As a result, and in keeping with trends in other provinces, Saskatchewan Elections reported that 273,010 people cast early ballots, with nearly 35,000 more votes cast during the first 48 hours of advanced polling than in the 2020 provincial election.

Elections Saskatchewan reported early Tuesday morning that just under 53 per cent of those eligible to cast a ballot did so, showing no uptick from 2020 and a decrease in voter turnout from 2016. According to Navigator’s research, advance turn-out is increasingly a function of convenience for voters, rather than a strong desire to seek change. Parties, particularly the Sask Party, would do well to acknowledge that voters in at least Regina and Saskatoon were looking for change and the party will have a strong opposition to contend with in the next four years.

A Fearsome Opposition Forms

Nearly doubling their previous seat count of 14 by winning over 10 new seats in the Legislature, the Saskatchewan NDP will gain a significantly larger caucus budget. This boost could pose challenges for the Sask Party, as the NDP will now be able to hire more staff and allocate more resources toward research. If they strategically leverage these advantages, they could mount a robust opposition over the next four years, establishing themselves as a formidable opponent in the next provincial election.

Cabinet Potential

Scott Moe is expected to announce a new cabinet in mid-November. Four high profile cabinet ministers announced their retirements before the election, and five additional ministers are projected to lose their seats, meaning that while many familiar faces are likely to remain and be in line for a promotion to the coveted job at Finance in particular, the appointment of newcomers to the cabinet table will be necessary.

Incumbent MLAs to watch as Moe decides his next cabinet include:

  • Warren Keading (Melville-Saltcoats)
  • Colleen Young (Lloydminster)
  • Terry Jenson (Warman)
  • Travis Keisig (Last Mountain-Touchwood)
  • Alana Ross (Prince Albert Northcote)

As the government ramps back up, we can expect a short legislative session kicked off by a throne speech ahead of the holidays.

Have any questions about the Saskatchewan Election? Please reach out to our political experts at info@navltd.com.

British Columbia Provincial Election

The 2024 British Columbia election on October 19 confirmed the province is firmly divided, with no clear winner emerging between David Eby’s NDP or John Rustad’s upstart Conservatives. Nearly half the electorate voted Conservative for the first time in generations, while the other half backed the NDP. Remarkably, the Greens, with just two MLAs and no official leader, emerged as the most powerful brokers in forming the next government.

Deadlock Between NDP and Conservatives as Province Awaits Vote Count

Amid a torrential rainstorm that caused flash flooding in the lower mainland, Saturday’s election upheld the province’s reputation for political drama. After seven years in power, the NDP suffered a stunning blow by the Conservative Party, which last ran a full slate of candidates in 1960. Independents split the vote in at least two ridings, paving the way for the NDP candidates to win those seats. The Green Party retained official status, but its leader Sonia Furstenau lost her seat to the NDP after switching ridings. The NDP and Conservatives both fall narrowly short of the 47 seats needed to form a majority in the 93-seat legislature:

  • NDP: 46 seats
  • Conservatives: 45 seats
  • Greens: 2 seats

Key Ridings to Watch

Margins were razor-thin in numerous constituencies with at least 11 ridings too close for media to call. The NDP led in six, while the Conservatives held the lead in five. Two automatic recounts are already set, with petitions likely to trigger more, particularly in three closely contested ridings where the Conservatives narrowly lost. While recounts seldom have a material effect on election results, this election might be the exception, despite use of electronic tabulators to initially count ballots. Ridings of note:

  • Surrey City Centre and Juan de Fuca-Malahat: The NDP leads by fewer than 100 votes (96 and 23 votes respectively), triggering automatic recounts due by Oct. 28.
  • Kelowna Centre: The Conservatives hold a slim lead of just 142 votes, making a recount likely.
  • Coquitlam-Burke Mountain: The NDP leads by 268 votes, likely also leading to a recount.

Uncertain Path Forward as Parties Scramble for Majority

The landscape remains highly uncertain, and neither leader delivered a concession speech Saturday night. Expect lots of jockeying, courting and wheeling and dealing as the counting takes place over the next eight days. One party has to secure enough votes to form a government, and/or a supply-confidence deal with the Greens to provide stability to govern.

For now, the NDP will continue to serve as the caretaker government until the formation of a new government. It could take weeks as negotiations unfold.

NDP (46 Seats): Retain Power Through Key Alliances

As the incumbent, the NDP has several paths:

  1. Negotiate with the Greens: Likely their best option, similar to their 2017 deal, but the Greens will demand major policy concessions, especially on climate issues.
  2. Secure a Speaker: They could stabilize their position by getting the Speaker role.
  3. Cross-party support: Though unlikely, they could try to convince opposition members to switch sides.

Conservative Party (45 Seats): New Contender with Limited Options

The Conservatives’ path is more difficult but not impossible:

  1. Recounts: The party will push for recounts in close ridings, which could shift the balance.
  2. Challenge NDP’s right to govern: Expect Rustad to fight hard, opposing NDP attempts at forming a government.
  3. Negotiate with Greens: Unlikely due to policy clashes, but desperation may prompt concessions.

Green Party (2 Seats): Kingmaker in a Tight Race

The Greens two MLAs hold the balance of power. They could:

  1. Support the NDP: More ideologically aligned, they could back the NDP in exchange for policy wins.
  2. Support the Conservatives: This would be challenging due to policy conflicts, particularly on climate.
  3. Remain neutral: The Greens could stay independent, keeping leverage over key votes of confidence that could bring down any government.

Cabinet Potential

While awaiting the Greens’ decision, key leaders and potential cabinet picks to watch for are:

NDP to Watch

When the writ was dropped, 25 per cent of NDP cabinet ministers chose not to seek re-election. Of those who ran, all but three were re-elected and will likely play key roles if the NDP forms government. Ones to watch include:

  • Mike Farnworth (Public Safety and Solicitor General)
  • Adrian Dix (Health)
  • Josie Osborne (Energy)
  • Grace Lore (Children and Family Services)
  • Bowinn Ma (Emergency Management and Climate Readiness)
  • George Chow (Citizens’ Services)
  • Ravi Kahlon (Housing)
  • Jennifer Whiteside (Mental Health and Addictions)
  • Brenda Bailey (Jobs and Economic Development)
  • Anne Kang (Municipal Affairs)
  • Lisa Beare (Post-Secondary Education)

Conservatives To Watch

The only incumbents on the Conservative side are former BC United/Liberal MLAs with cabinet-minister experience. These few have potential to be leaders within the party under Rustad, including:

  • Elenore Sturko, Surrey-Cloverdale
  • Bruce Banman, Abbotsford-South (Shadow Minister Emergency Management, Climate Readiness and Citizens’ Services)
  • Gavin Dew, Kelowna-Mission (Ran for BC Liberal Leadership in 2022)
  • Lorne Doerkson, Cariboo-Chilcotin (Defected to Tories and served as Third-Party Caucus Chair)
  • A’aliya Warbus, Chilliwack-Cultus (star candidate and daughter of former BC Lieutenant-Governor Steven Point)

Record-Breaking Advanced Voter Turnout

Amidst the uncertainty, one thing that’s for sure is the high level of public and voter engagement in following the results. More than one million people, or 28 per cent of registered voters, set a record at the advanced polls. It was also the first time the province used a new electronic voting system. Overall turnout reached just over 57 per cent, showing an improvement from the 54 per cent in 2020, though still lower than the 61 per cent seen in 2017.

Have any questions about the BC Election? Please reach out to our political experts at info@navltd.com.

Canadians demand change in Health Care: Navigator’s latest research reveals the urgent need for reform

At a glance

A new study by Navigator reveals Canadians are no longer questioning the basis for major health-care reform, but are demanding immediate action to meet their needs.

For two decades, Navigator has been at the forefront of public opinion research on the Canadian health-care system. Our latest study reveals that Canadians are no longer questioning the need for major health-care reform but are demanding immediate action. With nearly 90 per cent of Canadians calling for change, the message is clear: the system must evolve.

The latest findings provide crucial insights into the attitudes of Canadians and their expectations of our system.

Key findings from Navigator’s Research

  1. Broad Consensus for Reform: Canadians are overwhelmingly concerned about the health-care system’s ability to meet the needs of a rapidly aging population. Nearly 90 per cent believe that the government has neglected necessary improvements for too long and 73 per cent – an increase of 14 percentage points since 2022 – agree the system needs major reform, signaling widespread agreement that the status quo is no longer acceptable.
  2. Access is a Major Concern: As staffing shortages and wait times worsen, nearly half of Canadians say their access to public health care has worsened in the last few years and almost two-thirds have experienced unreasonable waits. Additionally, 94 per cent of Canadians agree they want better access to provincial health care.
  3. Shifting Assumptions: Traditional beliefs that health-care reform is politically perilous have been upended. Navigator’s research demonstrates Canadians are increasingly receptive to reform, including private sector involvement. The demand for access to high-quality, timely, and personalized care has shifted perspectives from concerns over affordability to a more consumer-focused approach.
  4. Support for Private Sector Involvement: There is growing support for integrating the private sector to address surgery backlogs and improve efficiency. Eight in 10 Canadians endorse private sector surgeries when publicly funded, and a majority seek innovative solutions rather than additional government funding.
  5. Openness to Innovation: Canadians are embracing new approaches to health care, including services from pharmacists and nurse practitioners and digital solutions like online appointments. However, acceptance of newer technologies, such as artificial intelligence, remains cautious.
  6. Commitment to Public Values: While there is strong support for private sector involvement, Canadians still value the principles of public health care. There is significant concern about user pay models and a call to ensure equitable access.

Navigating the future

“This shift underscores the urgent need for decision makers and opinion leaders to address the evolving demands for health-care reform, or face significant consequences. Our data tells the story of a system that stands on the precipice of profound change.

As the health-care landscape evolves, the greatest risk lies not in embracing change but in resisting it. Success will hinge on public trust, transparency, and a commitment to the well-being of all Canadians.”

– Jaime Watt, Executive Chairman, Navigator Ltd.

Methodology

Navigator’s 2024 health-care study is based upon an online national survey with 1,500 Canadians. This research aims to offer valuable guidance for policy-makers and stakeholders in navigating the future of Canadian health care.

Want to learn more?

Contact us to book a presentation: Jenna Dotzert, jdotzert@navltd.com

See how our study is shaping the conversation in The Globe and Mail.

Download a copy of the research summary below:

Home is where the votes are: Canada’s 2024 Budget

Chrystia Freeland’s fourth budget is less a fiscal plan than a political manifesto. She’s chosen again to spend in areas where the Liberals understand they are politically vulnerable while raising taxes on those who will cost them the fewest votes in the next election.

The finance minister and others in cabinet have been rolling out in a steady stream of new spending initiatives since Easter, $53 billion in total for housing, school food programs, a national disability benefit and other measures.

The goal is clear. The Liberals want to convince Millennial and Gen Z voters that they will help make life more affordable.

The flip side is that Freeland had to raise taxes to pay for these promises and to remain inside her fiscal guardrails – keeping the deficit at or below $40.1 billion while lowering the debt-to-GDP ratio this year and into the future.

The cost, according to many economists, is that there’s little in the budget to address Canada’s growing productivity gap with other industrialized nations, a gap the OECD projects will continue in the decades ahead threatening Canadians’ standard of living.

But the future for the Liberals is now with an election at most 18 months away. They need this spending to shore up support among younger voters, the ones who helped them win the past three elections, and to retain the support of their junior partners, the NDP.

The budget title sums up the theme, “Fairness for Every Generation.”

Fairness in this budget means higher taxes of more than $20 billion to be borne by a select group of mostly older Canadians.

Freeland is raising the capital gains inclusion rate from 50 per cent to 66 per cent for individuals, corporations and trusts reporting more than $250,000 in capital gains. The government says the change will affect only the wealthiest 0.13 per cent of Canadians.

No surprise there. A Navigator Discover poll conducted from March 26 to April 1 of 1,500 adults found the vast majority of respondents – 78 per cent – support taxing the ultra-wealthy.

The same poll suggested 85 per cent of respondents across age groups, regions and genders listed the high cost of living as the most important issue for government to address. When asked who was most to blame, they identified corporate greed and Justin Trudeau as the top two culprits.

One of those two is easier to blame than the other. Cue higher taxes on the wealthiest few. Spend billions on the young and the politically restless.

You can find our full analysis of the budget below. For more analysis, or support engaging government on any of the budget announcements, contact your Navigator team or reach out at info@navltd.com.