Navigator logo

Young voters and the Ontario election

Over the past several weeks, American teenagers have seized the forefront of their national gun debate – speaking to media, challenging politicians and sharing their personal experiences with gun violence. It doesn’t stop at gun policy – but all over the world, age increasingly predicts how people vote.

Indeed, on many issues, generational divides exist on national questions. Most young Americans have a favourable view of gay marriage relative to older generations.[1] Young Britons voted overwhelmingly against Brexit in 2016[2]. Right here at home, young voters turned out in record numbers for Justin Trudeau’s Liberals in 2015.

It is conventional wisdom in politics that young people do not vote. Therefore, parties put forward platforms that appeal to other parts of the population that reliably show up to the polls. But as witnessed in Canada’s 2015 election and the United Kingdom’s 2017 election, the younger demographic can influence elections when motivated to turn out.

In Ontario, the Ontario Progressive Conservatives are the odds-on favourite to win the June election. The party has led every opinion poll since the Sudbury by-election, and won five out of seven by-elections (even in reliably Liberal areas) since the start of this parliamentary session.

According to a recent poll, the 18-24 demographic still backs the Ontario Liberals, where 42 per cent of voters say they will back the government, compared to 24 per cent for the PCs and 18 per cent for the NDP.[3]

In Doug Ford, the PCs have new leader who is a potent political force.

Comparisons with Donald Trump aside, Mr. Ford is anything but. The Fords have, for years, relied on the support of working-class communities in Toronto. In fact, they often had more voters in common with the Liberals and New Democrats than the Progressive Conservatives.

And while Donald Trump channels the voices of those who feel left behind by the economy, Mr. Ford channels the voices of people who feel left behind by this government. People who feel the government has overtaxed, overspent and intervened more than its welcome.

In other words, Mr. Ford is a conventional conservative who appeals to bedrock pocketbook issues. He rails against the elites and taps into concerns about the role of government in everyday lives.

Never to be undone, the Liberals have tried to seize the populist mantle with more Bernie Sanders-flavour. This week, the Liberals’ commissioned a throne speech that zeroed in on the anxieties of people just getting by, as work becomes more precarious, where stable and lifelong jobs with high wages and health and retirement benefits shrink in number.

Young people bear more of this burden. Today, almost one third of young workers are in temporary contract work – a generation ago, that number was one-quarter. The unemployment rate of those 24 and under is also disproportionately higher than the average – at 11.2 per cent in January relative to the average of 5.5 per cent. With skyrocketing housing prices in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, youth everywhere increasingly feel they will never be able to buy their own homes.

At the same time, young people are particularly supportive of the sexual education curriculum – a fact that the Liberals are sure to exploit.[4]

Mr. Ford’s position on the sexual education curriculum may affect the PC campaign if the Liberals manage to convince and energize young voters to turn out and vote against conservative candidates. Mr. Ford is already walking back his earlier statements on several social issues and has committed to also being the leader for the more progressive elements within the PC Party.

Despite this, in March, half of voters 18-24 disapprove of Premier Kathleen Wynne’s performance, with only 32 per cent approving and the rest expressing no opinion. In contrast, Mr. Ford has a net positive rating of 5 per cent, with almost one third expressing no opinion over his leadership style.

Mr. Ford speaks with a personal authenticity and credibility that other politicians can only aspire towards. In him, the PC Party can suddenly reach new constituencies that they could not hope to reach under more conventional leaders or normal elections. Mr. Ford certainly can make inroads among younger voters too.

 

Sources

[1] http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/

[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/567922/distribution-of-eu-referendum-votes-by-age-and-gender-uk/

[3] https://www.campaignresearch.ca/single-post/2018/03/15/Doug-Fords-PC-Party-Set-to-Win-Big-in-June

[4]http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/ON%20Sex%20Ed%20News%20Release%20(2015%2002%2028)%20Forum%20Research.pdf

What’s in store for Canada’s cannabis economy?

Navigator’s cannabis industry podcast, Legalized, returns for Season 2, March 26, 2018.

In Season 1, we watched as some of Canada’s now-leading cannabis brands set up shop and built their businesses. We also tracked the consultations and findings of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation.

This season we’re checking in again with the businesses we met in season 1. We’ll be talking to the Hon. Anne McLellan, former Chair of the Task Force, about Bill C-45 and whether or not the legislation properly reflects her recommendations. And we’ll be examining the fears and concerns many in Canada still have about cannabis and legalization.

Tune in every week starting March 26 for new episodes of Legalized.

 

Views expressed do not necessarily represent those of Navigator or its affiliates.

Unfiltered Ford Has The Best Chance

Jaime Watt, who has orchestrated communication strategies behind elections across Canada, is writing a three-part series advising each of the main provincial party leaders on their best path to winning a majority government on June 7. This is Part 1.

It would be difficult to find a single Ontarian who even casually follows politics who is not familiar with the many challenges Ontario’s Progressive Conservative party has faced in the past couple of months. The twists and turns and drama are unlike anything the province has seen before.

And the timing of this Shakespearean tragicomedy makes the stakes even higher: In just a few weeks, the PCs will have an opportunity to replace the Liberal government after 15 long years.

It has been a long time in the political wilderness for the Tories – and they are ready to re-assume the reins of government.

Party members can all but taste victory, smelling the blood in the water that comes from the Wynne government’s historically high levels of unpopularity.

The choice of Doug Ford last weekend is high-risk and potentially high-reward.

Christine Elliott, his opponent in the leadership race, is a savvy politician who would have been a safe pair of hands running against an unpopular premier. Elliott is articulate, measured and deeply knowledgeable about the provincial government.

Ford, by contrast, is bombastic, unscripted and not particularly well-schooled in policy.

But last week demonstrated why what many perceive to be Ford‘s biggest weakness is, in fact, his strength.

Ford‘s straight-talking style is jarring. For example, when a reporter asks him a question, he answers frankly. His answers have the ring of authenticity. It’s jarring only because Ontarians have grown accustomed to politicians speaking in terms that are rendered meaningless by political correctness.

Early media reviews of Ford‘s style have been unflattering. A recent CBC interview portrayed the new leader as being “flustered” and “frustrated.”

In fact, Ford‘s interview was perfectly reasonable – and sounded so to Ontarians who are tired of the same old

rhetoric.

When pressed on where he would come up with financing for his campaign platform, Ford said he would find it in “efficiencies” in government, a notion that has long been mocked by the media.

But when the reporter tried to skewer him for it, Ford quickly turned the tables, pointing out that he had actual experience in finding efficiencies and that he was going to find “four cents on the dollar.”

To many Ontario voters, this makes a lot of sense. Ontarians listening to that widely mocked radio interview almost certainly agree that four cents of every dollar spent by the Government of Ontario is wasted.

To many in the political class and the media, that idea is heresy. They insist it simply can’t be done.

These same commentators made these same comments during Mike Harris‘s campaign. But the Harris team stayed the course, despite the concern of institutional worrywarts.

The result? The received wisdom was simply not right, and Harris was rewarded with a massive majority. Ontarians were fed up and that feeling of discontent simmers today.

So that’s Ford‘s path to victory. He must continue telling his truths in the same real way that Ontarians believe. The man has a believability about him that other politicians just can’t capture.

There will be barrels of ink spilled on his errors and his approach, complaining that he simply doesn’t understand government and the nuances of policy.

But many Ontarians feel our province is headed in the wrong direction. They might not be able to put their finger on it, but there is a deep-seated sense that the provincial government has gotten things wrong.

Doug Ford gives voice to that feeling of discontent. And regardless of what the experts say, it’s the Progressive Conservatives’ best chance to win government in a generation.

It will sometimes be tempting for political advisers to try to rein the leader in, or to make his messaging more professional and buttoned down. But that’s the exact wrong instinct.

A better instinct is to let Doug be Doug.

Jaime Watt is the executive chairman of Navigator Ltd. and a Conservative strategist.

Sneak Peak at Legalized Season 2

The House is away this week, so for this episode of Political Traction we’re looking at the launch of Legalized Season 2. Navigator produces Legalized, which is a look at Canada’s legal cannabis industry. On this episode, you’ll hear a clip from the show about the issues currently facing legislators and law enforcement when it comes to enforcing cannabis-impaired driving laws.

 

Views expressed do not necessarily represent those of Navigator or its affiliates.